In the scandal with the Football Club “Chaika”, the company SHELL not only risks its reputation

0

by Anton Petrachenko

Recently, without any exaggeration, a historic event took place in Russia: the first criminal case for the holding of a rigged football match was opened. This is the match which took place in May 2019 between Football Club “Chaika” from the village of Peschanokopskoye and Novorossiysk “Chernomorets”.

At the end of the trial, several people, including the sports manager of “Chaika”, the judge, the inspector, members of the technical staff and players of “Chernomorets”, were sanctioned, without however being linked to the ‘incarceration.

For now – because the trial of the organizers of the agreement is still pending. And it will take place in Voronezh, far from Rostov-on-Don. The reason for this geographical diversity of the crime scene and the place of justice is called almost in the clear. It is as follows: so that the Themis and the participants in the process do not come under pressure from the side of the owner of FC “Chaika”, an authoritative businessman in the Don region, Andrey Chaika.

And now here are some very interesting numbers. As the investigators established, the athletes of Novorossiysk were promised half a million rubles for their “services” in the field. That’s the rough equivalent of 6,000 euros – for the third division of Russian football, a good one-time win, even divided by six. And the other sums: it is reliably known that on one of the matches of “Chaika” – it is clear who it is – there were bets for 60 million rubles (more than 700 thousand euros) . They all did the right thing, bringing strangers over 350 million (over 4 million euros). The profitability is incredible, but where is the connection with Shell?

The point is, Andrey Chaika doesn’t just own a football club. He also owns the eponymous LLC – “the leading wholesale supplier of modern Shell lubricants for all types of equipment”. This is exactly what is stated on the site. There is also the logo of the Anglo-Dutch company – after all, the company Chaika is its official distributor. Security forces have also surely come across the image of Shell’s red and yellow shell on several occasions when they searched the contractor’s office in the event of a deal.

And here is the moment. Yes, the searches have taken place, the file has been opened, the trial will take place. But the main beneficiaries of the strange matches of FC “Chaika” were not the center of attention of the law. Only performers can end up in jail, but why aren’t real tycoons pulled from the shadows into the light? And why would the Themis hide from the influential Andrey Chaika in Voronezh, instead of studying in depth the possible involvement of the owner of the “official Shell distributor” in the illegal processes?

As far as is known, the concern itself has not commented on its representative’s involvement in the football scandal. On the one hand, this is understandable – “Chaika” shows good sales. For example, last year the company’s net profit amounted to 44 million rubles, almost half of the 2019 figure. On the other hand, all the advantages of Shell’s cooperation with a businessman can’t they turn into a big minus at the same time? And not just reputation.

In general, the history of world trade knows many instructive stories of how the largest companies suffered losses due to contact with corruption. We can in particular recall the scandal of the turn of the century – Siemens was caught in the distribution of bribes to officials of several countries and was fined 201 million euros by the court of the Federal Republic from Germany. Also memorable is a more recent collision with Daimler, whose executives confessed to unscrupulous acts that cost the automaker first $ 185 million in fines and then another half a billion dollars in investigative spending. internal. Chon Mon Gu is not forgotten either – the Hyundai boss was sentenced to three years in prison in 2007 for embezzling $ 130 million from company funds, and the official was also accused of concluding agreements unfavorable to Hyundai. One way or another, the practice of imposing sanctions on leaders of the world economy is very varied, and the level of tolerance for corruption in their affairs is close to zero.

We can assume that the president of Shell in Russia, Sederik Kremers, should soberly assess the situation and weigh all the risks of cooperation with such an “official distributor”. By the way, Shell declares honesty as one of its values. Would it not therefore be fair on the part of the concern to assess what happened on the Rostov-on-Don?


Source link

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.